Since the age of eight my closest friend was, what later came to be called ‘gay’, although the word did not exist in those days. All I knew was that he was, and always has been my best friend, not least because we were complimentary to each other, but most of all because he would never let me down. Vincent was a brilliant pianist and had most of the classical repertoire in his head when I couldn’t read or write with any proficiency. By the time I could he had a degree in English from Cambridge and became a lecturer for the rest of his life. He hated sports of all kinds and I was good at almost all of them. When I was in dire straits and in danger of being left homeless it was Vincent who offered me a home. At his funeral I cried for the first time in living memory. After his death my wife and I became close to another ‘gay’ friend equally talented and equally committed to the Catholic faith for which he, like Vincent, would have died. He lived with a ‘gay’ friend whom he loved, but with whom, as he explicitly insisted, he never had any sexual relationship. For him the very idea of gay marriage was utterly abhorrent.
Power In Weakness
I have begun with these two stories because I do not want to be accused of being homophobic for what follows. The truth of the matter is I have met many so called ‘gay’ Catholics, who have inspired me to such an extent that I now have no doubt that there have been many such mystics and saints. These ‘gay Catholics’ were generally born with what others may see as a weakness just as I was born with a weakness too. But for St Paul (2 Corinthians 12:9) what others call a weakness can become a person’s greatest strength, as dyslexia has been my greatest strength.
It is perhaps understandable that in the past ‘gay’ men were attracted to communities of men as the safest and most desirable place to seek God. When I tried my vocation even before the Second Vatican Council, of forty five others at least six were ‘gay’ although I only realise this with hindsight. At the time ‘gay’ seminarians kept their heads down, they were there but they were latent. I know several who went on to become excellent priests.
50,000 left the Priesthood
A massive disillusionment after the Council led many tens of thousands of young priests and religious to leave the priesthood and religious life. The usual figure quoted is 50,000, but I think that is an underestimation. For obvious reasons the vast majority of ‘gay’ seminarians and priests remained behind. When in the sixties and seventies celibacy in general became taboo for the majority of the younger generation vocations to the priesthood suffered, except for many ‘gay’ Catholics, who continued to be attracted to the priesthood and the religious life. When in 1979 I was giving a lecture tour in South Africa I found that St John Vianney seminary in Pretoria was almost entirely populated by ‘gay’ seminarians. I found the whole atmosphere sick and depressing. They openly admitted that for them the vow of celibacy meant that although this obliged them to refrain from sex with women it did not prevent them from having sex with other men, and they did quite openly.
The Troubles at Maynooth
When I returned to Europe I met a young religious priest while lecturing on Mystical Theology in Rome only to find the same sort of mentality had infected his own order, or at least at the house of studies where he returned to teach, and where he found that as a heterosexual male he was treated as a pariah. Returning to England I was made the Dean of Studies at the National Radio and Television Centre at Hatch End. When a large group of Franciscan students came to make a video recording of their musical on the life of St Francis I found they all seemed to be ‘gay’. My feelings at the time were confirmed by a Franciscan Priest who I met in London only a matter of weeks ago who was a student at that house of studies in Canterbury at the time, where he described how the ‘gay’ seminarians gradually took over and ruled. In more modern times a similar situation was discovered at the great Irish seminary of Maynooth and, as those who read the Catholic media will know, there have been long and bitter struggles to try and remedy the situation. However all these examples from my own personal experience are as nothing compared with the situation in the USA at the present. Just as later Rome forbade all talk about women priests, in the nineteen-nineties Rome forbade all talk about homosexuality. It was strictly forbidden. It was and has been the green light for homosexual males to flood into and take over many, if not most seminaries. Then later this happened to whole dioceses with more and more homosexual bishops, archbishops, and cardinals, encouraging and promoting their own with what now appears to be disastrous consequences. One of the most conservative but highly respected Catholic moral theologians in the USA, Professor Janet Smith, has said that now most dioceses in the USA are full of homosexual priests and many are run by them. In fact well over seventy percent of clergy from top to bottom are ‘gay’.
They are pushy, pugnacious and partisan
I don’t just mean ‘gay’ as friends of mine were ‘gay’ as many good priests have been and still are ‘gay’ ‘ – but militantly ‘gay’ – not as celibate individuals but as pushy, pugnacious partisans with agendas hardly distinguishable from secular LGBT communities that they wish to impose on the Church. This can be seen in parishes they have taken over in the USA.
I am not a psychiatrist, but it seems clear to me that whereas individual seminarians and priest can make excellent pastors, when they become the majority in a seminary or in a whole diocese the consequences can be extremely serious. Evidence has already shown many times over that attractions, flirtations, love affairs, envy, jealousy and all the other love making shenanigans soon become the norm and traditional spirituality is all but outlawed, as are new heterosexual vocations who either have to keep their heads down and fit in or get out, as many do. The impression is at present being given from ‘on high’ that the sexual horrors that have depraved the Church for all too long now are all but over, but that is far from the truth. If paedophilia is finally under control and dealt with, which I very much doubt, then pederasty is all but out of control especially in some countries like the USA.
The Elephant in the Church
It is the ‘elephant in the room’, or I suppose I should say in the Church and as Cardinal Muller said recently, over eighty times more prevalent than paedophilia ever was. There can be no going forward without this whole matter coming out and into the open, and being dealt with as it was in the early Church. I admit that despite my experiences I found the matter so detestable that I pretended that I had been mistaken and looked the other way, hoping I had been unlucky enough to have stumbled on rare anomalies that would simply go away. But in subsequent years, like insidious fungus, the proliferation of pederasty has grown underground only to mushroom all over the Catholic world, but in the USA there are now whole drifts of them almost everywhere. In recent months I have been shocked beyond shocked. I am only speaking out now because I remained silent before and contributed to the growth of the pernicious poison that will choke the life out of the Church, if it is not rooted out immediately. I am sick of remaining silent for fear of giving scandal to the laity, when it is with them, that it now seems, is our main hope of deliverance.
Cheers and Jeers for Cardinal Hume
I listened to a ‘gay’ speaker who was cheered when he said that Cardinal Hume was ‘on our side’ immediately followed by jeers of derision when he went on to say – ‘as long as we don’t do it’. For communities of ‘gays’ the very idea was unthinkable! Let me be quite clear, sodomy was not only considered an abomination in the Old Testament, but in the New Testament too. If it was committed in the early Church it had to be admitted publicly and the offenders had to undergo the sacrament of reconciliation throughout Lent with all the appropriate penances. If they continued to offend after that they were permanently excluded from the Christian community. Nothing has changed nor can it change – sodomy is a very serious sin and permanent offenders who are priests, bishops or cardinals, being in mortal sin, cannot administer the sacraments lawfully whether there has been an official condemnation from Rome or not. It would be the same if your parish priest installed a mistress in the presbytery. Their seriously sinful actions ‘ipso facto’ (by the very act of performing them) instantly separate them from the mystical body of Christ. They cannot therefore perform any of the sacraments lawfully, nor is it lawful for any of the faithful to approach them to do so. Parishes run by such priests are in effect under an interdict whether such an edict has been issued from Rome or not. They simply do not belong to us nor we to them despite all the external similarities.
Time for transparency
The time for secrecy and cover ups is over. It is now the time for truth, transparency and accountability. Everything is about to come out into the open anyway and in the very near future. However, I will now take my bow, because other journalists will expose and comment on the scandals that will go on and on. My job will be to do what I do best and that is to offer the solution. I have said what I have said to make it plain that I am not just an old ‘has-been’ who lives in ‘cloud cuckoo land’ endlessly peddling pious platitudes. Nor do I intend to act like a nouveau Nero playing my fiddle while Rome is reduced to ashes, my job is to offer the solution? But more of this next time.
First published in The Catholic Universe 19th October 2018

David, I feel coming to your article is an answer to prayer. I was at that seminary at that time. The atmosphere was indeed depressing for the reasons you give; even though the actual number of openly gay seminarians (and at least one priest) was very much smaller than you suggest. Nonetheless, it all had a terrible effect on me, and perhaps I should have run away from that place. But I wanted to be a priest, was convinced I had a vocation, and was duly ordained. But this negative experience had poisoned me with a kind of hatred that eventually saw me self-destruct and leave the ministry (big mistake!). My 30-odd years since then have been ridden with deep regret and sorrow. I continue to pray the liturgy of the hours, and for the last decade or so have have made mental prayer a part of my daily routine. But I find myself obsessed each day with thoughts on how different it could have all been then, and how blessed my life might have turned out without this poison that has affected the Church more than many dare to admit.
Marc, I am so sorry you have had this negative experience that changed your life so radically. You are not alone in having been affected so radically by the environment you found yourself in. But I am impressed that despite your deep sorry you continue to make mental prayer part of your daily routine. It is the only way forward and I hope and pray that the darkness will lift and allow you peace. Thank you for your honesty and your truthfulness.
If I raise the topic re homosexuality infiltrating the church the response is always one of denial. Must say I have not had contact with suspect priests, but then in a small town with only rural Africans in the Umzimkuhle district actually being ordained, and hardly any remain in the area do not get to see the bigger picture. Just so very sad that Jesus suffered and died for His “Holy” church. David, you are much appreciated for your sincerity and true love for Our Lord as evidenced in your profound books.
Thank you for your thoughts and your comment, Rosalie
Thank you for an excellent article. As former Episcopalians, I might say that the Episcopal Church is full of “gays” also, and many of us were deluded by them for years. Their essential dishonesty and amused pleasure of fooling us “straights,” along with the idea that somehow we were responsible for AIDS added to our frustration. I might add that I never met one that wasn’t an alcoholic, though undoubtedly they exist. All of this could be tolerated–but within a church? And certainly not within THE Church. And the active group who insisted that they must be accepted and made leaders, along with the cynical, smug comments from James Martin and Cdl Marx, indicates what dire straits our Church is in. What can we do but pray?
Dire straits indeed, Kathleen. We must pray……..
Thank you.
David
Your straightforward condemnation of the carnally Homosexual situation in the Church was difficult for me to read without my feeling smug and self-righteous. I was also conscious of the possibility that I was being a borderline closet-case calling the pot black. Like many heterosexuals, I have vices that I would like to justify. I suspect that homosexuals are supported by most of society because if sodomy is ok for them, then my deviation must be ok for me. Watching dozens of “straight” men and women marching in so-called “Pride” parades, I can’t help but wonder which vice they are into, such that they seek reciprocal support from the sodomy crowd.
Homosexuality in the Church is a somewhat different kettle of fish. The great beauty and the great challenge of the Church is that it has morals and ethics that aren’t voted on democratically; they are sourced from Holy Scripture, Sacred Tradition and direct guidance by the Holy Spirit. The catch-phrase is “non-negotiable”. We don’t vote on abortion, anal sex or priestesses; these aberrations are simply forbidden, no refunds.
Some have declared that child-abuse in the Church is not a homosexual issue, that it is only about the harm done to children by men. Bullshit. Nor is it a problem that “ordained” homosexuals have with boundaries, that if they restricted their sex lives to other men, Priests and eight-teen year old seminarians, all would be well. Again, Bollocks. Some others would play the “neuroses card”, a little therapy, the right drugs and Bob’s Your Uncle. Not true. Yes, this is a profound spiritual/emotional disorder, but the only remedy is the Heavenly Physician. St Paul might suggest prayer and fasting, I would go for the Sacraments myself.
I have used the phrase: “The Homo-Feminist situation in the Church” and I stand by it. No one will doubt that the Gender-Feminists and the front-line homosexuals are in league and supported 100% by the Liberal Party. But it isn’t JUST sodomy or Feminists desecrating alters, it is a cluster of symptoms – a spectrum to use the trendy term for these disorders, that have brought the Church into disrepute across the world. As Pope Benedict XVI found out, dealing with only one or two problems was missing the point, another Catholic Reformation is needed and that won’t happen without an inspired and charismatic leader. Any volunteers?
Thanks for your usual honesty Ronald, which I appreciate. Yes, we definitely need something drastic to restore order, morals and ethics in the Church. Perhaps all we have is to just try starting with ourselves. Renewal in the Church has always come through good and prayerful members of the laity. Volunteering?
I totally agree with you David in what you wrote in this article. I’m doubly happy that having you as my mentor these last 25 years or so has not been an illusion and I endorse all that I’ve learned from you. You never dilute what you have to say even when it seems harsh at first glance but you manage to declare truths without being spiteful, always in a loving manner. I bless the day when I came across your writings that have kept me encouraged in spite of many ups and downs in my spiritual and normal life. May the good Lord keep blessing you and yours and I hope that many others read your books and digest your wise and truthful words to their advantage. God bless you David.
Bless you Godfrey. Thank you.
David
Thank you David, for addressing this matter with your usual thorough and pellucid prose. I have been following this matter through the fulminations of Michael Voris of Church Militant and have always considered him a bit over the top. But here you not only echo his concerns and more, but confirm that the corruption in the American church exists here as well. I agree entirely that this is a time for the committed Catholic to stand firm although apart from individual prayerful devotions, I am not sure what we can do to change what seems to be a well entrenched ecclesiastical aberration.
Thanks for being in touch Warwick. Always good to hear from you. I understand your point of view. I tend these days to watch EWTN and particularly the weekly ‘The World Over’ for the news. I feel they are interviewing knowledgeable canon lawyers and journalists. It’s also on Youtube if you google Raymond Arroyo. This one is worth watching https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvOqCG-PLro&t=31s
God bless
Thanks David for the link which I have watched. I agree Raymond Arroyo is a good interviewer who manages to make the same points without being as abrasive as Michael. Another good source is Taylor Marshall of the New St Thomas’s Institute who is also on You Tube. Keep up the good work David, I always read your contributions when I get them by email.
Thanks for this link Warwick. I’ll have a look at it. Always good to hear from you.
David
Very, very well put. You [promise another article. Is it published yet?
Thank you so much. It’s written and was published in the Catholic Universe UK, 9th November where I have a regular column. But it will be published soon on Catholic Stand and on my site.
David
David, Thank you
Good to hear the truth.
Sad for the Body of Jesus, the Holy Church.
What is hidden in the darkness, will be brought into the Light. The Church can no longer be in untruth, blocking the Holy Spirit.
Sad indeed Colum. Thank you and God bless,
David